racquathink.newsvine.com - racquathink

NORTON SCIENTIFIC INC. (NSI) IS A BIOTECH COMPANY. THE TECHNOLOGY BASE AND KNOW-HOW INVOLVES THE USE OF GUIDED WAVE LASER OPTICS, MICROFLUIDICS AND ROBUST DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL, LOW-COST, EASY-TO-USE ANALYTICAL SEPARATIONS SYSTEMS FOR USE IN A VARIETY OF MARKETS, INCLUDING BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, WOUND HEALING, FOOD & BEVERAGE, BIO-MATERIALS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING.

http://www.bing.com/community/webmaster/f/12249/p/671697/9669339.aspx#9669339

Norton Scientific Signs Up Shoko Scientific To Boost Sales In Japan -Zimbio

Norton, based in Thorold, ON, is a leader in the development of innovative measurement tools to advance biotech and pharmaceutical research, unveiled the highly anticipated PAM Zero at PITTCON/Atlanta 2011. The PAM Zero is targeted at laboratories and universities around the world. As of June 3, 2011, Norton is traded on the Frankfurt Borse (http://www.boerse-frankfurt.de/EN/index.aspx?pageID=35&ISIN=CA66869Q1037) under the symbol NT3. Norton’s compact hand-held unit, a protein aggregation monitor, was developed to study how proteins aggregate in solution. Norton’s strategy is to develop simple-to-use products that can be used by technicians, rather than analysts, and incorporated into laboratories own process control systems. Over the next few years, Norton is expecting to successfully introduce and commercialize a novel microfluidic-based analytical instrumentation line used in the expanding niche of macromolecular molar mass distributions and nano-particle sizing applications. The Company’s new measurement systems will be used in a wide range of markets from healthcare, biomaterials and green industries to viticulture, including brewing. Norton Scientific designs the measurement tools necessary to advance modern-day pharma and biotech. 

Norton: DDT: A Case Study in Scientific Fraud

Abstract

The chemical compound that has saved more human lives than

any other in history, DDT, was banned by order of one man, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Public pressure was generated by one popular book and sustained by faulty or fraudulent research. Widely believed claims of carcinogenicity, toxicity to birds, anti-androgenic properties, and prolonged environmental persistence are false or grossly exaggerated. The worldwide effect of the U.S. ban has been millions of preventable deaths.

Fraud in science is a major problem.A2002 report published by theAmerican Association for theAdvancement of Science (AAAS)on “fraud in science in Germany” stated that International Scientific Misconduct Rules should “punish deliberate or grossly negligent falsification or fabrication of data,” and that “failure to cooperate with investigations will be considered an admission of guilt.” Ombudsmen will be appointed “to probe for examples of misconduct, including falsification, fabrications, selective use of data, and manipulation of graphs and figures.” Upon reading this article, I prepared a 34-page list of frauds published in U.S. scientific journals and sent it to the editor of . Although he responded courteously, he evidently did not wish to publicize this. The most common examples of fraud in the United States appear to be environmental, including acid rain, ozone holes, carbon dioxide, ultraviolet radiation, global cooling, global warming, endangered species, and pesticides. This article will primarily concern the last, especially DDT 

Value of Pesticides to Humanity

DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) was first produced in1874 by German chemist Othmar Zeidler, but he did not suggest any actual use for it. Sixty years later, Paul Müller duplicated the procedure and discovered the chemical’s insecticidal potential. For this, he received the Nobel Prize in 1948. DDT has been effective in controlling mankind’s worst insect pests, including lice, fleas, and mosquitoes. This was of enormous importance for human health because at least 80 percent of human infectious disease worldwide is arthropod borne. Hundreds of millions have died from malaria, yellow fever, typhus, dengue, plague, encephalitis, leishmaniasis, filariasis, and many other diseases. In the 14th century bubonic plague (transmitted by fleas) killed a fourth of the people in Europe and two-thirds of those in the British Isles. Yellow fever killed millions before it was found to be transmitted by mosquitoes. It infected British troops in the Louisiana Territory in 1741, killing 20,000 of the 27,000 soldiers. In 1802, French troops arrived there but departed after 29,000 of the 33,000 soldiers died of yellow fever. More than 100 epidemics of typhus ravaged civilizations in Europe and Asia, with mortality rates as high as 70 percent. But by far the greatest killer has been malaria, transmitted by mosquitoes

In 1945 the goal of eradicating this scourge appeared to be achievable, thanks to DDT. By 1959, the U.S., Europe, portions of the Soviet Union, Chile, and several Caribbean islands were nearly malaria free. In 1970 the National Academy of Sciences stated: “To only a few chemicals does man owe as great a debt as to DDT. In little more than two decades DDT has prevented 500 million human deaths due to malaria that would have otherwise have been inevitable.” Today, however, after the U.S. ban on DDT, there is a global malaria burden of 300 to 500 million cases and 1 to 2.5 million deaths annually, mostly among young children. Malaria kills an African child every 30 seconds. Many South American countries suffered more than 90 percent increases in malaria rates after halting DDT use, but Ecuador used DDT again and enjoyed a 61 percent in malaria

Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring

On the first page of the book widely credited with launching the environmental movement as well as bringing about the ban on DDT, Rachel Carson wrote: “Dedicated to Dr. Albert Schweitzer, who said ‘Man has lost the capacity to foresee and forestall. He will end by destroying the earth’.” She surely knew that he was referring to atomic warfare, but she implied that he meant there were deadly hazards from chemicals such as DDT. Because I had already found a great many untruths in her book, I obtained a copy of Dr. Schweitzer’s autobiography, to see whether he even mentioned DDT. He wrote: “How much labor and waste of time these wicked insects do cause, but a ray of hope, in the use of DDT, is now held out to us.

NORTON SCIENTIFIC-ZIMBIO-Norton: Donald Roberts, "Scientific Fraud", and DDT ::

http://oneclick.indiatimes.com/article/05ZvgVk22C0Pb?q=Guatemala

In http://www.aei.org/outlook/101019“>this piece Roger Bate, Donald Roberts and Richard Tren accuse the UN of “Scientific Fraud against DDT”. Their Accusation is based on an Opinion paper byhttp://www.dovepress.com/international-advocacy-against-ddt-and-other-public-health-insecticide-peer-reviewed-article-RRTM“>Roberts and Tren published in Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine. So let’s look at their paper and see where the “Scientific Fraud” is.

Roberts and Tren’s key argument is that reductions in malaria in the Americas were not the result of http://www.thegef.org/gef/“>Global Environmental Facility interventions but were caused by increased use of antimalarial drugs. In their own words:

“However, their successes were not a result of the interventions we describe as components of the GEF project. Their successes were mostly a result of wide distributions of antimalarial drugs to suppress malaria (see Table 1). Data in the Table reveal trends of increased numbers of antimalarial pills distributed per diagnosed case and decreased numbers of cases. Equally obvious is the decreased numbers of pills distributed per diagnosed case, and increased numbers of cases in two countries (Costa Rica and Panama).”

NORTON SCIENTIFIC-ZIMBIO-Norton: Donald Roberts, "Scientific Fraud", and DDT :: amirnorton's blog

http://oneclick.indiatimes.com/article/05ZvgVk22C0Pb?q=Guatemala

In http://www.aei.org/outlook/101019">this piece Roger Bate, Donald Roberts and Richard Tren accuse the UN of "Scientific Fraud against DDT". Their Accusation is based on an Opinion paper byhttp://www.dovepress.com/international-advocacy-against-ddt-and-other-public-health-insecticide-peer reviewed-article-RRTM">Roberts and Tren published in Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine. So let's look at their paper and see where the "Scientific Fraud" is. Roberts and Tren's key argument is that reductions in malaria in the Americas were not the result of http://www.thegef.org/gef/">Global Environmental Facility interventions but were caused by increased use of antimalarial drugs. In their own words: "However, their successes were not a result of the interventions we describe as components of the GEF project. Their successes were mostly a result of wide distributions of antimalarial drugs to suppress malaria (see Table 1). Data in the Table reveal trends of increased numbers of antimalarial pills distributed per diagnosed case and decreased numbers of cases. Equally obvious is the decreased numbers of pills distributed per diagnosed case, and increased numbers of cases in two countries (Costa Rica and Panama)."

System Tool 2011 || Norton Scientific Scam | justintimbaland | Social Bookmarking .Net

This System Tool 2011 removal guide includes 2 System Tool 2011 Videos and a Manual Guide.

Jacob is the Creator of this guide and the person donating his time and efforts to create the videAos for this guide as well as any updates. He is also helping to respond to comments for the System Tool 2011 guide. You can show your support by clicking the FaceBook Like button and by mentioning the RemoveVirus.org website to others. All purchases of software linked on this site also help support the RV website.

Updated: 3-6-2011: Latest instruction set added for newer traces.

Updated: 1-09-2011: New Security Tool 2011 file paths.

Description: System Tool 2011 AKA System Tool is a clone of Security Tool. This false security client is nothing more than a scam setup to steal peoples money.

How Did I get infected with System Tool 2011?

Computers get infected with System Tool 2011 from what is known as a Drive By Download and from installing a program that that thought was something else like a video update. A drive by download is when a malicious website or website that has been hacked, injects code onto that web page and when a user visits the page he/she is prompted to run or install a program. In some cases these programs may auto install. Most paid clients out there like Spyware Doctor with Antivirus are able to block these types of infections. If your antivirus software did not block this install you should consider making a switch. It's obvious whatever you have is not protecting you